Lecture 13

10/16

Extensive and Intensive Properties

Intensive: state variable that is independent of system size. These are the variables that determine equilibrium between two bodies:

Extensive: state variable that grows with system size, keeping intensive variables fixed. Examples include:

Natural Variables

Just recalling the thermodynamic identity:

dU=TdS−PdV+μdN

This relation implies that the natural coordinates for the energy are S,V,N, i.e. changes in internal energy dU are related to changes in entropy, volume, and number. All of the arguments are extensive. So we may write U=U(S,V,N), i.e. the internal energy as a function of S, V and N.

Euler Relation

A particularly interesting identity comes from considering how extensive properties change with system size.

Let us consider changing S→λS, V→λV and N→λN, U→λU. As we observed from the thermodynamic, the internal energy is a natural function of these extensive variables, so it depends on S, V, and N. However, since U is also extensive, as a result of this transformation of all extensive variables, U will also transform like all of the other extensive variables, U→λU. Writing this as an equation, we get:

U(λS,λV,λN)=λU(S,V,N)

Differentiating both sides then setting λ=1, we get

U=(∂U∂S)V,NS+(∂U∂V)S,NV+(∂U∂N)S,VN

From the thermodynamic identity, we get the partial derivative relations

T=(∂U∂S)V,N,−P=(∂U∂V)S,N,μ=(∂U∂N)S,V

Therefore, we arrive at the very handy and remarkable Euler relation for Thermodynamics:

(1)U=TS−PV+μN

Thermodynamic Potentials

Legendre Transformation

It is sometimes not convenient to work with purely extensive dependent variables. U depends naturally on extensive variables. This motivates the question: is there a thermodynamic state function that depends naturally on different variables? How do we even change variables?

This is what the Legendre transformation is for.

Take a function f(x) that depends on x. It's differential is given by

df=(∂f∂x)dx

We can define p=∂xf, and define a new function g=xp−f. Then differentials of g are

dg=xdp+pdx−pdx=xdp
So dg is naturally a variable of p.

(N.B. This comes up in classical mechanics, when we want to go from lagrangian to hamiltonian: H(x,p)=x˙p−L(x,x˙), with p=∂x˙L )

So it is possible to change variables by redefining the function. But we cannot do it willy-nilly. Each extensive variables as a natural partner (conjugate) intensive variable:

S→T
V→P
N→μ

So we can take a function of S and convert it to a function of T. Similarly with V and P, and N and μ.

Energy

We start with the energy, and the conventional thermodynamic identity

U=U(S,V,N), dU=TdS−PdV+μdN

I will use the notation Φ(S,V,N)

Enthalpy: H=U+PV

If we replace volume with pressure, we get the enthalpy:

H(S,P,N)=U+PV

The differential of enthalpy then satisfies a new thermodynamic identity:

dH=dU+PdV+VdP=TdS+VdP+μdN

To get the second equality, just substitute the conventional thermodynamic identity to cancel PdV.

Helmholtz Free Energy: F=U−TS

Replacing S with T gives the Helmholtz Free energy:

F(T,V,N)=U−TS, which satisfies the identity

dF=dU−TdS−SdT=−PdV+μdN−SdT

Partial derivative relations imply

(∂F∂T)V,N=−S,(∂F∂V)T,N=−P

The first relation implies we can determine the internal energy from F using only derivatives wrt temperature:

U=F−T∂TF=−T2∂T(F/T)V

If you know F(T,V,N), you can extract the internal energy. In this sense, F is called a thermodynamic potential (analogous to electric or gravitational potential)

Gibbs Free Energy: G=U−TS+PV

Replacing both S and V with their intensive conjugate variables ends up giving the Gibbs Free energy:

G=Φ(T,P,N)=U−TS+PV which satisfies the differential identity:

dG=dU−TdS−SdT+PdV+VdP+μdN=−SdT+VdP+μdN

A few partial derivative relations that will be useful later on come directly from this:

S=−(∂G∂T)P,N,V=(∂G∂P)T,N

Notice that if we use the Euler relation Eq. (1), it implies the Gibbs free energy is directly proportional to the number of particles:

G=μN

Grand Potential: Φ=U−TS−μN

We now consider replacing S→T, N→μ. This produces the Grand potential:

Φ(T,V,μ)=U−TS−μN

which satisfies

dΦ=−SdT−Ndμ−PdV

Notice again that using the Euler relation Eq. (1) implies: Φ=−PV

See problem 5.23 in Schroeder for more on this thermodynamic potential.

Gibbs-Duhem Equation

There is an interesting relation which follows when we replace all the extensive variables with their conjugate intensive variables. Following the logic above, we should define a new thermodynamic potential

ϕ(T,P,μ)=U−TS+PV−μN

However, by the Euler relation Eq. (1), ϕ=0, and furthermore the differentials must be exactly zero. However, this implies a nontrivial relation connecting variations between intensive variables, called the Gibbs-Duhem equation:

−SdT+VdP−Ndμ=0